Saghizadeh v Castlepoint Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
Saghizadeh v Castlepoint Ins. Co. 2012 NY Slip Op 07978 Decided on November 21, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 21, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
SANDRA L. SGROI
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2011-11377
(Index No. 25041/09)

[*1]Payem Saghizadeh, respondent,

v

Castlepoint Insurance Company, et al., defendants, Joseph F. Coluccio, appellant.




Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP, White Plains,
N.Y. (Nancy Quinn Koba and Sheryl T. Parker of counsel), for
appellant.
Aboulafia Law Firm, LLC, New York, N.Y. (Matthew S.
Aboulafia and Jack Glanzberg of counsel),
for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for negligence and breach of a contract to procure insurance, the defendant Joseph F. Coluccio appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated October 24, 2011, which denied his motion for leave to renew his prior cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him, which had been denied in an order of the same court dated February 3, 2011.

ORDERED that the order dated October 24, 2011, is affirmed, with costs.

A motion for leave to renew shall be based upon new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination and shall contain reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior motion (see CPLR 2221[e][2], [3]). Here, the appellant, Joseph F. Coluccio, failed to meet the requirements of CPLR 2221(e) with his submission of, inter alia, the plaintiff's deposition testimony. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion for leave to renew his prior cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

The appellant's remaining contentions are not properly before this Court.
FLORIO, J.P., DICKERSON, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.