Matter of Bullock v Edwards

Annotate this Case
Matter of Matter of Bullock v Edwards 2012 NY Slip Op 07997 Decided on November 21, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 21, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SANDRA L. SGROI
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2011-10899
(Docket No. F-00303-11)

[*1]In the Matter of Lamonte Bullock, respondent,

v

Sue Ann Edwards, appellant.




Sue-Ann Edwards-Arroyo, formerly known as Sue Ann Edwards,
Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se.
Robert A. Ugelow, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Katz, J.), dated September 28, 2011, as denied her objections to so much of an order of the same court (Milsap, S.M.), dated August 5, 2011, as fixed the father's child support obligation at the sum of $686.93 semi-monthly.

ORDERED that the order dated September 28, 2011, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the mother's contention, the Support Magistrate properly applied the factors set forth in Family Court Act § 413(1)(f) in determining the father's child support obligation (see Family Ct Act § 413[1][f]; Matter of Cassano v Cassano, 85 NY2d 649, 651).
ANGIOLILLO, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.