People v Stanley

People v Stanley 2012 NY Slip Op 06981 Decided on October 17, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 17, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
ANITA R. FLORIO
RUTH C. BALKIN
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, JJ.
2011-03304

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Kaseam Stanley, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 9840/10)




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Seth M. Lieberman of
counsel; Victoria Sypniewski on the
memorandum), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gubbay, J.), imposed March 2, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735; People v Foy, 89 AD3d 1103, 1103; People v Pertillar, 37 AD3d 740).
MASTRO, J.P., FLORIO, BALKIN and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court