People v Pinckney
Annotate this CaseDecided on October 17, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
ANITA R. FLORIO
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.
2011-03102
(Ind. No. 2446/10)
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Damien T. Pinckney, appellant.
Del Atwell, East Hampton, N.Y., for appellant.
Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Michael
Blakey of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (J. Doyle, J.), rendered March 22, 2011, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is without merit (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404).
RIVERA, J.P., FLORIO, DICKERSON, LEVENTHAL and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.