People v Fenty

People v Fenty 2012 NY Slip Op 07314 Decided on November 7, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 7, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
SANDRA L. SGROI
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2010-09731
(Ind. No. 09-00622)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Raheem Fenty, appellant.




John R. Lewis, Sleepy Hollow, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant
pro se.
Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Lauren
E. Grasso and Andrew R. Kass of
counsel), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered September 13, 2010, convicting him of criminal sexual act in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and we have also reviewed the defendant's pro se supplemental brief. Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631).
ENG, P.J., FLORIO, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court