People v Haylett

Annotate this Case
People v Haylett 2012 NY Slip Op 07691 Decided on November 14, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 14, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
2010-06636
(Ind. No. 47/10)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Paul D. Haylett, appellant.




Neal D. Futerfas, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.
William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
(Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel),
for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered June 17, 2010, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the County Court erred in imposing restitution without a hearing because there was insufficient evidence in the record to support its finding of the actual dollar amount and out-of-pocket loss to the victim caused by the defendant's crime. However, since the defendant failed to request a restitution hearing and did not object to the amount of restitution he was required to pay, his present claims regarding the imposition of restitution are unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Horne, 97 NY2d 404, 414 n 3; People v Francis, 82 AD3d 1263; People v Nelson, 77 AD3d 973; People v Harris, 72 AD3d 1110, 1112), and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, CHAMBERS and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.