People v Fully

Annotate this Case
People v Fully 2012 NY Slip Op 07315 Decided on November 7, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 7, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
MARK C. DILLON
PLUMMER E. LOTT
JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.
2009-02087
(Ind. No. 170/08)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Sulla Fully, appellant.




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kathleen Whooley of
counsel), for appellant.
Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y.
(Morrie I. Kleinbart and Michael
Shollar of counsel), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Collini, J.), rendered February 20, 2009, convicting him of assault in the second degree, attempted robbery in the third degree, resisting arrest, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of assault in the second degree and attempted robbery in the third degree beyond a reasonable doubt (see Penal Law § 160.00; People v Samuel, 84 AD3d 841; People v Barksdale, 50 AD3d 400, 401). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342), we nevertheless accord great deference to the factfinder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410, cert denied 542 US 946; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt with respect to the convictions of assault in the second degree and attempted robbery in the third degree was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633).
ENG, P.J., DILLON, LOTT and COHEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.