Dapolito v Stop & Shop Supermarket

Annotate this Case
Dapolito v Stop & Shop Supermarket 2011 NY Slip Op 09083 Decided on December 13, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 13, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, A.P.J.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SANDRA L. SGROI
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2011-04675
(Index No. 101577/09)

[*1]Myrsa Dapolito, et al., respondents,

v

Stop & Shop Supermarket, appellant.




Torino & Bernstein, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Michael A. Amodio and
Bruce A. Torino of counsel), for appellant.
George F. Sacco, Staten Island, N.Y., for respondents.


DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Minardo, J.), dated March 29, 2011, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

The injured plaintiff allegedly tripped and fell over an empty display platform in between the ends of two aisles at the defendant's supermarket. The platform was about four inches tall, four feet wide, and four to five feet deep. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, contending that the condition was open and obvious, and not inherently dangerous. The Supreme Court denied the motion. We reverse.

The defendant established, prima facie, that the display platform at issue was open and obvious, and not inherently dangerous (see Bretts v Lincoln Plaza Assoc., Inc., 67 AD3d 943, 944; Neiderbach v 7-Eleven, Inc., 56 AD3d 632; Tenenbaum v Best 21 Ltd., 15 AD3d 646). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
MASTRO, A.P.J., CHAMBERS, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER: [*2]

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.