Rampino v Shaffren

Annotate this Case
Rampino v Shaffren 2011 NY Slip Op 09300 Decided on December 20, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 20, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, A.P.J.
RUTH C. BALKIN
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
2011-04009
(Index No. 17645/09)

[*1]Robert S. Rampino, et al., respondents,

v

Steven J. Shaffren, et al., appellants.




Curtis Vasile, P.C., Merrick, N.Y. (Michael J. Dorry of counsel),
for appellant Steven J. Shaffren.
Richard T. Lau, Jericho, N.Y. (Gene W. Wiggins of counsel),
for appellants Bernard S. Davis and
Pentagon Plumbing and Mechanical
Corp.
Baron Associates P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Daniel Davidovic of
counsel), for respondents.


DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Bernard S. Davis and Pentagon Plumbing and Mechanical Corp. appeal, and the defendant Steven J. Shaffren separately appeals, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated March 22, 2011, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Robert S. Rampino on the ground that that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellants appealing separately and filing separate briefs.

The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff Robert S. Rampino did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957). Rampino alleged, inter alia, that as a result of the subject accident, he sustained injuries to the cervical and lumbosacral regions of his spine. On the motion for summary judgment, the defendants submitted evidence establishing, among other things, prima facie, that the alleged injuries to the cervical and lumbosacral regions of Rampino's spine did not constitute serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) (see Rodriguez v Huerfano, 46 AD3d 794, 795). Although the defendants also attempted to establish, prima facie, that those alleged injuries were, in any event, not caused by the accident, they failed to do so, as their evidentiary submissions actually demonstrated the existence of a triable issue of fact as to causation (see Luby v Tsybulevskiy, 89 AD3d 689; Kelly v Ghee, 87 AD3d 1054, 1055; see also Hightower v Ghio, 82 AD3d 934, 935).

In opposition, Rampino submitted evidence raising a triable issue of fact as to whether the alleged injuries to the cervical and lumbosacral regions of his spine constituted serious injuries under the permanent consequential limitation of use and/or significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102(d) (see Perl v Meher,NY3d, 2011 NY Slip Op [*2]08452, * 4-5 [2011]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by Rampino.
MASTRO, A.P.J., BALKIN, CHAMBERS and SGROI, JJ., concur.


2011-04009 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Robert S. Rampino, et al., respondents,
v Steven J. Shaffren, et al., appellants.
(Index No. 17645/09)

Motion by the respondents on appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 22, 2011, to dismiss the appeal of the defendant Steven J. Shaffren. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated July 8, 2011, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeals for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, upon the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the submission of the appeals, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.
MASTRO, A.P.J., BALKIN, CHAMBERS and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.