People v Abreu

Annotate this Case
People v Abreu 2011 NY Slip Op 07825 Decided on November 1, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 1, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
RANDALL T. ENG
ARIEL E. BELEN
L. PRISCILLA HALL, JJ.
2010-10050

[*1]People of State of New York, respondent,

v

Apolonio Abreu, appellant.




Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Katherine A. Levine of
counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Linda Breen of counsel;
Reuben Arnold on the brief), for
respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), dated September 22, 2010, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The People established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant strangled his rape victim to death. Accordingly, he was presumptively designated a level three sex offender pursuant to the automatic override which applies to offenders who have inflicted serious physical injury or caused the death of the victim (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 3-4 [2006 ed.]; People v Carter, 85 AD3d 995, lv denied,NY3d, 2011 NY Slip Op 86305 [2011] ; People v Fareira, 80 AD3d 589, 590; People v Martin, 79 AD3d 717, 718; People v King, 74 AD3d 1162, 1163). Further, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v Livingston, 87 AD3d 628; People v Alston, 86 AD3d 553, 554; People v Carter, 85 AD3d at 995-996; People v Bussie, 83 AD3d 920).
MASTRO, J.P., ENG, BELEN and HALL, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Matthew G. Kiernan

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.