Matter of Martin

Annotate this Case
Matter of Martin 2011 NY Slip Op 08597 Decided on November 22, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 22, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2010-05276
2010-10356

[*1]In the Matter of Hattie G. Martin, deceased. Miladin Dobric, appellant; David J. Baron, respondent. (File No. 1070/08)




Miladin Dobric, Long Island City, N.Y., appellant pro se.
Baron & Baron, Esqs., P.C., Forest Hills, N.Y. (David J.
Baron, respondent pro se, and Kristen A.
Meilak of counsel), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

In a probate proceeding in which David J. Baron, as executor, petitioned for the judicial settlement of the decedent's estate, the objectant appeals (1) from an order of the Surrogate's Court, Queens County (Nahman, S.), dated May 21, 2010, which, inter alia, granted the petitioner's motion for summary judgment dismissing his objections, and (2) from a decree of the same court dated September 27, 2010, which, upon the order, judicially settled the account.

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, with one bill of costs payable by the appellant personally.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the decree in the proceeding (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order would have been brought up for review on the appeal from the decree. However, since the appendix filed by the appellant is inadequate to enable this Court to render an informed decision on the merits, the appeal from the decree must be dismissed (see Miller v Cruise Fantasies, Ltd., 74 AD3d 921; Marcantonio v Picozzi, 46 AD3d 522).
DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Matthew G. Kiernan

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.