People v Estrella

Annotate this Case
People v Estrella 2011 NY Slip Op 09295 Decided on December 20, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 20, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
RANDALL T. ENG
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.
2010-04840

[*1]People of State of New York, respondent,

v

Bradley Estrella, appellant. Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Bonnie C. Brennan of counsel), for appellant.




Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Tiffany L. Henry on the
brief), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mullen, J.), dated June 14, 2011, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the notice of appeal dated May 14, 2010, is deemed to be a premature notice of appeal from the order dated June 14, 2011 (see CPLR 5520[c]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order dated June 14, 2011, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant's contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive level two risk assessment is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Bowles,AD3d,, 2011 NY Slip Op 07826, *5 [2d Dept 2011]; People v Spring, 83 AD3d 1028; People v Iorio, 74 AD3d 1306, 1307; People v Williams, 46 AD3d 652) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112; People v Bowles,AD3d at, 2011 NY Slip Op 07826, *5 [2d Dept 2011]; People v Spring, 83 AD3d at 1028; People v Iorio, 74 AD3d at 1307). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly designated the defendant a level two sex offender.
RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, ENG and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.