People v Stanislas

People v Stanislas 2011 NY Slip Op 08621 Decided on November 22, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 22, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
2010-04306
(Ind. No. 12362/08)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Kenley Stanislas, appellant.




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Solomon Neubort of
counsel; Benjamin Barczewski on
the brief), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), rendered March 29, 2010, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made because the Supreme Court failed to specifically enumerate certain of his constitutional rights is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea on that ground prior to sentencing (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Reyes, 41 AD3d 620; People v Watson, 19 AD3d 518; People v Maddy, 110 AD2d 719), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, CHAMBERS and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Matthew G. Kiernan

Clerk of the Court