Clarke v Clarke

Clarke v Clarke 2011 NY Slip Op 09080 Decided on December 13, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 13, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, A.P.J.
SANDRA L. SGROI
JEFFREY A. COHEN
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2009-00543
(Index No. 23904/06)

[*1]Gwendolyn Clarke, appellant,

v

Paul K. Clarke, respondent.




Gwendolyn Clarke, Wappingers Falls, N.Y., appellant pro se.
Paul K. Clarke, New Haven, Connecticut, respondent pro se.


DECISION & ORDER

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), entered December 9, 2008, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, failed to direct the defendant to pay child support arrears, failed to award her maintenance, and failed to equitably distribute the value of the defendant's medical license.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

An appellant is obligated "to assemble a proper record on appeal, which must include any relevant transcripts of proceedings before the Supreme Court" (Kruseck v Ross, 82 AD3d 939, 940; see CPLR 5525[a]; 5526; Gorelik v Gorelik, 85 AD3d 859, 860-861; Kociubinski v Kociubinski, 83 AD3d 1006, 1007; Schwartz v Schwartz, 73 AD3d 1156, 1156-1157). The record must also "contain all of the relevant papers that were before the Supreme Court, including the transcript, if any, of the proceedings" (Matison v County of Nassau, 290 AD2d 494, 494).

Here, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment which, inter alia, failed to direct the defendant to pay child support arrears, failed to award the plaintiff maintenance, and failed to equitably distribute the value of the defendant's medical license. However, the plaintiff's failure to provide this Court with the full transcript of the nonjury trial conducted before the Supreme Court renders the record on appeal inadequate to enable this Court to reach an informed determination on the merits. Thus, the appeal must be dismissed (see Gorelik v Gorelik, 85 AD3d at 861; Kociubinski v Kociubinski, 83 AD3d at 1007; Schwartz v Schwartz, 73 AD3d at 1157).
MASTRO, A.P.J., SGROI, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino [*2]

Clerk of the Court