People v Robinson

People v Robinson 2009 NY Slip Op 08642 [67 AD3d 933] November 17, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 6, 2010

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Jermaine Robinson, Appellant.

—[*1] Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Andrew E. Abraham of counsel), for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Danielle Hartman of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hollie, J.), rendered October 12, 2006, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, robbery in the third degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, under all of the circumstances of this case, his attorney provided meaningful representation (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]).

The remaining contentions raised in the brief submitted by the defendant's counsel are without merit. Additionally, except for the contention that he was denied his right to a speedy trial pursuant to CPL 30.20, the contentions raised in the defendant's supplemental pro se brief are unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Goode, 87 NY2d 1045, 1047 [1996]; People v Robinson, 47 AD3d 847, 848 [2008]; cf. People v Cusumano, 108 AD2d 752, 754 [1985]). In any event, all of the contentions are without merit. Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Eng and Lott, JJ., concur.