People v Corker

Annotate this Case
People v Corker 2009 NY Slip Op 08633 [67 AD3d 926] November 17, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 6, 2010

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Wykeme Corker, Appellant.

—[*1] Gary E. Eisenberg, New City, N.Y., for appellant.

Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel; Severyn Rebisz on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Alfieri, J.), imposed June 4, 2007, upon his conviction of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

The defendant's contentions that resentencing him approximately 7 years into his 12½-year term of imprisonment to add to his sentence the statutorily mandated period of postrelease supervision (see Penal Law § 70.45) violated his State and Federal constitutional rights to due process, to equal protection, and not to be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment, are unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Rosario, 22 AD3d 871, 872 [2005]; People v Travis, 213 AD2d 571 [1995]; cf. People v Samms, 95 NY2d 52, 56 [2000]), and we decline to reach those contentions in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The period of postrelease supervision imposed on the resentence was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.