Brancaccio v Kohl's Dept. Stores, Inc.

Annotate this Case
Brancaccio v Kohl's Dept. Stores, Inc. 2009 NY Slip Op 07968 [67 AD3d 618] November 4, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Rosemarie Brancaccio, Respondent,
v
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., Appellant.

—[*1] Steven F. Goldstein, LLP, Carle Place, N.Y. (Christopher R. Invidiata of counsel), for appellant.

Zalman & Schnurman, New York, N.Y. (Norman E. Frowley of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), entered May 5, 2009, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issues of whether there was a defect in the speed bump over which the plaintiff tripped and fell, and, if so, whether the alleged defect was trivial and therefore not actionable (see Berry v Rocking Horse Ranch Corp., 56 AD3d 711 [2008]; Cuebas v Buffalo Motor Lodge/Best Value Inn, 55 AD3d 1361 [2008]; Boxer v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 52 AD3d 447 [2008]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit or need not be addressed in light of our determination. Santucci, J.P., Chambers, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.