Shallash v New Is. Hosp.

Annotate this Case
Shallash v New Is. Hosp. 2009 NY Slip Op 07820 [66 AD3d 988] October 27, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Anthony Shallash et al., Appellants,
v
New Island Hospital et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo P.C., New York, N.Y. (Brian J. Shoot and David Dean of counsel), for appellants.

Furey Kerley Walsh Matera & Cinquemani, P.C., Seaford, N.Y. (Lauren B. Bristol of counsel), for respondent New Island Hospital.

Bartlett, McDonough, Bastone & Monaghan, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Edward J. Guardaro, Jr., and Adonaid Casado Medina of counsel), for respondent Anthony Carlisi.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), entered January 8, 2009, as, upon reargument, vacated its prior determination in an order entered May 15, 2008, granting those branches of the defendants' separate motions which were pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside a jury verdict on the issue of liability as contrary to the weight of the evidence and for a new trial, and thereupon granted those branches of the defendants' separate motions which were pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict on the issue of liability as unsupported by legally sufficient evidence and for judgment as a matter of law.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered January 8, 2009, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order entered January 8, 2009, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from that order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Shallash v New Is. Hosp., 66 AD3d 988 [2009] [decided herewith]). Rivera, J.P., Santucci, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.