Eugene Racanelli, Inc. v Incorporated Vil. of Babylon

Annotate this Case
Eugene Racanelli, Inc. v Incorporated Vil. of Babylon 2009 NY Slip Op 07794 [66 AD3d 954] October 27, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Eugene Racanelli, Inc., et al., Respondents,
v
Incorporated Village of Babylon et al, Appellants.

—[*1] Miranda Sambursky Slone Sklarin Verveniotis LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Michael A. Miranda of counsel), for appellants.

Barry V. Pittman, Bay Shore, N.Y., for respondents.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia J.), dated March 25, 2008, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment dismissing their counterclaim for, among other things, specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The cover letter attached to an unexecuted contract of sale for the subject real property, which was sent to the attorney representing the defendants, specifically provided that the seller would not be bound until the contract of sale had been executed and delivered to the office of the defendants' attorney. Inasmuch as neither full execution nor delivery was accomplished prior to the time that the plaintiffs' attorney communicated his clients' desire not to go forward with the transaction, no binding contract was created (see 219 Broadway Corp. v Alexander's, Inc., 46 NY2d 506, 512 [1979]; Apostle v Kac, 113 AD2d 912 [1985]; Beck v New York News, 92 AD2d 823, 824-825 [1983], affd 61 NY2d 620 [1983]; cf. Sorenson v Brahver, 43 AD3d 903 [2007]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment dismissing the counterclaim. Skelos, J.P., Covello, Santucci and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.