Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Young

Annotate this Case
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Young 2009 NY Slip Op 07578 [66 AD3d 819] October 20, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Respondent,
v
Kimberlee M. Young et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

—[*1] Clair & Gjertsen, Scarsdale, N.Y. (Ira S. Clair of counsel), for appellants.

Steven J. Baum, P.C., Amherst, N.Y. (Suzanne E. Panara and Caren L. Samplin of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Kimberlee M. Young and Anthony T. Young appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated July 15, 2008, which denied their motion, inter alia, to vacate a final judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court dated March 24, 2008.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants' contention, the Supreme Court did not err in determining that they waived the issue of standing by failing to timely appear or answer (see CPLR 3211 [a] [3]; [e]; HSBC Bank, USA v Dammond, 59 AD3d 679 [2009]; Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v Mastropaolo, 42 AD3d 239 [2007]).

In light of this determination, we need not reach the appellants' remaining contention. Rivera, J.P., Florio, Miller and Austin, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.