Chamberlain v Chamberlain

Annotate this Case
Chamberlain v Chamberlain 2009 NY Slip Op 07573 [66 AD3d 811] October 20, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Karen Elizabeth Chamberlain, Appellant,
v
Mark Henry Chamberlain, Respondent.

—[*1] Mayer, Ross & Hagan, P.C., Patchogue, N.Y. (Robert W. Mayer and Damon A. Hagan of counsel), for appellant.

Winkler, Kurtz, Winkler & Kuhn, LLP, Port Jefferson Station, N.Y. (Steven P. Kuhn of counsel), for respondent.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered July 8, 2004, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Bivona, J.), dated April 21, 2008, as, in effect, granted those branches of the defendant's motion which were to modify the defendant's visitation schedule with the parties' children and to clarify a provision of the judgment of divorce relating to the identity of the person or persons authorized to pick up the parties' children for their periods of visitation with the defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff's procedural objections to the order appealed from do not warrant reversal.

The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit (see People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405 [1987]; Matter of Petkovsek v Snyder, 251 AD2d 1086 [1998]). Prudenti, P.J., Miller, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.