People v Thomas

Annotate this Case
People v Thomas 2009 NY Slip Op 07387 [66 AD3d 750] October 13, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 9, 2009

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Nahshon T. Thomas, Appellant.

—[*1] Kent V. Moston, Hempstead, N.Y. (Jeremy L. Goldberg and David A. Bernstein of counsel), for appellant. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Margaret E. Mainusch and Joanna Hershey of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Gulotta, J.), dated May 3, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in upwardly departing from the defendant's presumptive sex offender level (see People v Villane, 49 AD3d 517, 517-518 [2008]; People v Fabara, 49 AD3d 619 [2008]). The court's determination was supported by clear and convincing evidence based, inter alia, on the case summary prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, the defendant's mental health evaluation, and the probation department report (see People v Fabara, 49 AD3d 619 [2008]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Florio, Eng and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.