Figueroa v Gueye

Annotate this Case
Figueroa v Gueye 2009 NY Slip Op 07226 [66 AD3d 640] October 6, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Erick Figueroa, Respondent,
v
Samba Gueye, Doing Business as Tres Elegante, Defendant, and Dane D. Huggins, Appellant.

—[*1] Gannon, Rosenfarb & Moskowitz, New York, N.Y. (Jennifer B. Ettenger of counsel), for appellant.

Ira M. Pearlman and Robert D. Rosen, Roslyn, N.Y. (Mitchell Dranow of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Dane D. Huggins appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated March 6, 2008.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In an order dated September 9, 2009, the Supreme Court vacated the judgment appealed from. Accordingly, the appeal has been rendered academic. Fisher, J.P., Santucci, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.