Morales v Coram Materials Corp.

Annotate this Case
Morales v Coram Materials Corp. 2009 NY Slip Op 06008 [64 AD3d 759] July 28, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Aaron W. Morales, Appellant,
v
Coram Materials Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

—[*1] Steven Cohn, P.C., Carle Place, N.Y. (Susan E. Dantzig of counsel), for appellant.

Tormello, McDonnell & Kehoe, Melville, N.Y. (Kevin P. Slattery of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Costello, J.), dated May 15, 2008, as granted that branch of the renewed motion of the defendant Coram Materials Corp. which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Although the defendant Coram Materials Corp. moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it based only on the General Obligations Law, upon our authority to search the record (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Dunham v Hilco Constr. Co., 89 NY2d 425, 429-430 [1996]) and for the reasons stated in our decision and order on the companion appeal (see Morales v Coram Materials Corp., 64 AD3d 756 [2009] [decided herewith]), we affirm the dismissal of the complaint insofar as asserted against Coram Materials Corp.

In light of the foregoing determination, the parties' remaining contentions have been rendered academic. Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.