Rabinovich v Shevchenko

Annotate this Case
Rabinovich v Shevchenko 2009 NY Slip Op 05310 [63 AD3d 1027] June 23, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Alexander Rabinovich, Appellant,
v
Oksana Shevchenko, Respondent.

—[*1] Richard A. Kraslow, P.C., Melville, N.Y., for appellant.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Blydenburgh, J.), dated June 12, 2008, which denied his oral application for a downward modification of his pendente lite maintenance obligation.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from did not determine a motion made on notice, and is therefore not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Steven L.Levitt & Assoc., P.C. v Computer Handlers Corp., 7 AD3d 613 [2004]; Johnson v Ladin, 7 AD3d 674, 675 [2004]; Stern v Stern, 273 AD2d 298, 299 [2000]; Cuffie v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 260 AD2d 423 [1999]). No motion for leave to appeal has been made, and under the circumstances, we decline to grant leave on our own motion (see Independence Constr. Corp. v AMOCO Constr. Corp., 33 AD3d 963 [2006]; Steven L.Levitt & Assoc., P.C. v Computer Handlers Corp., 7 AD3d 613 [2004]; Cuffie v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 260 AD2d 423 [1999]). Mastro, J.P., Florio, Eng and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.