Matter of Progressive Northeastern Ins. Co. v Harding

Annotate this Case
Matter of Progressive Northeastern Ins. Co. v Harding 2009 NY Slip Op 05141 [63 AD3d 947] June 16, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 5, 2009

In the Matter of Progressive Northeastern Insurance Company, Appellant,
v
Ronny D. Harding, Respondent.

—[*1] Buratti, Kaplan, McCarthy & McCarthy, Yonkers, N.Y. (Michael A. Zarkower of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas Guccione (Thomas Torto, New York, N.Y., of counsel), for respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kurtz, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated April 4, 2008, which, after a hearing, denied the petition and, in effect, directed the parties to proceed to arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court's determination that there was physical contact between the vehicle of the petitioner's insured and an unidentified vehicle (see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition and, in effect, directed the parties to proceed to arbitration (cf. Matter of Nova Cas. Co. v Musco, 48 AD3d 572, 573 [2008]). Florio, J.P., Miller, Covello and Austin, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.