Board of Mgrs. of 2121 Shore Condominium v Estate of Mhatre

Annotate this Case
Board of Mgrs. of 2121 Shore Condominium v Estate of Mhatre 2009 NY Slip Op 05075 [63 AD3d 867] June 16, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Board of Managers of 2121 Shore Condominium, Appellant,
v
Estate of Bharat K. Mhatre, Respondent.

—[*1] Schechter & Brucker, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Kenneth H. Amorello of counsel), for appellant.

Steven R. Finkelstein, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

In an action to recover unpaid condominium common charges and related fees, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated May 12, 2008, as granted its motion for reimbursement of additional counsel fees and expenses only to the extent of awarding the sum of $5,000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances here, we find no basis to disturb the granting of the plaintiff's motion for reimbursement of additional counsel fees and expenses only to the extent of awarding the sum of $5,000, to supplement the prior award of counsel fees and expenses in the foreclosure judgment (see Miller Realty Assoc. v Amendola, 51 AD3d 987, 990 [2008]; Sempra Energy Trading Corp. v PG&E Tex. VGM, 284 AD2d 253, 254 [2001]; Orix Credit Alliance v Grace Indus., 261 AD2d 521, 522 [1999]; Granada Condominium I v Morris, 225 AD2d 520 [1996]). Rivera, J.P., Miller, Balkin and Austin, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.