Johnson v Robertson

Annotate this Case
Johnson v Robertson 2009 NY Slip Op 04389 [63 AD3d 690] June 2, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 5, 2009

L. Scott Johnson, Appellant,
v
Bryan Robertson et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

—[*1] Frank P. Guarino, Wading River, N.Y., for appellant.

McGovern, Connelly & Davidson, New Rochelle, N.Y. (John A. Vasile of counsel), for respondents.

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), dated October 31, 2008, which denied his motion to vacate a notice of mechanic's lien filed by the defendant Robertson Contracting and granted the defendants' cross motion pursuant to Lien Law § 12-a (2) to amend the notice of mechanic's lien nunc pro tunc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the misdescriptions in the notice of mechanic's lien did not render the notice jurisdictionally defective and were properly corrected by amendment pursuant to Lien Law § 12-a (2) (see Manniello v Ghadimi, 279 AD2d 460 [2001]; Matter of Corina Assoc. v McManus, Longe, Brockwehl, 39 AD2d 613 [1972]; Matter of Murdock v Kleist, 250 App Div 127 [1937]).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit. Dillon, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Austin, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.