People v Fecu

Annotate this Case
People v Fecu 2009 NY Slip Op 03534 [61 AD3d 991] April 28, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 10, 2009

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Robert Fecu, Appellant.

—[*1] Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Thomas S. Burka of counsel; Xiaobo Chen on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.), rendered September 19, 2006, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenge to the validity of his plea of guilty is not preserved for appellate review because he did not move to withdraw the plea (see People v Clarke, 93 NY2d 904, 906 [1999]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637 [1983]). In any event, his contentions are without merit (see People v Akhtar, 13 AD3d 383, 383-384 [2004]; cf. Innes v Dalsheim, 864 F2d 974 [1988], cert denied 493 US 809 [1989]). Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.