Globe Surgical Supply v Allstate Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
Globe Surgical Supply v Allstate Ins. Co. 2009 NY Slip Op 03133 [61 AD3d 821] April 21, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Globe Surgical Supply, as Assignee of Charles Charlotin, Appellant,
v
Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent.

—[*1] Locks Law Firm PLLC, New York, N.Y. (Andrew P. Bell and Seth R. Lesser of counsel), Thomas W. Alfano, Garden City, N.Y., and Belesi & Conroy, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (John M. Belesi of counsel), for appellant (one brief filed).

Short & Billy, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Skip Short and Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP [Steven Michael Levy, pro hac vice], of counsel), and Wiggin and Dana LLP, New York, N.Y. (Charles Platto of counsel), for respondent (one brief filed).

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), entered April 26, 2007, as denied that branch of its motion which was to certify a class pursuant to CPLR article 9.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, by adding the words "without prejudice to renewal of the motion" following the words "class action certification is DENIED"; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff.

This action is in all material respects identical to Globe Surgical Supply v GEICO Ins. Co. (59 AD3d 129 [2008]). As in that case, and for the reasons stated therein, Globe Surgical Supply, as assignee of Charles Charlotin, met all of the class certification prerequisites in the instant matter except adequacy of representation (see CPLR 901 [a] [4]). Accordingly, that branch of its motion which was to certify a class action should have been denied without prejudice to renewal (see Globe Surgical Supply v GEICO Ins. Co., 59 AD3d 129 [2008]). Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Miller and Eng, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.