People v Lorick

Annotate this Case
People v Lorick 2009 NY Slip Op 01138 [59 AD3d 567] February 10, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 1, 2009

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Derrick Lorick, Appellant.

—[*1] Philip H. Schnabel, Chester, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Robert H. Middlemiss and Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered December 6, 2005, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Orange County, for further proceedings.

The plea minutes reveal that the defendant was not informed, prior to entering his plea, that his sentence would necessarily include a period of postrelease supervision. Therefore, the plea must be vacated (see People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541 [2007]; People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 245 [2005]; People v Bernard, 53 AD3d 586 [2008]; People v Cook, 49 AD3d 777 [2008]; People v Thompson, 47 AD3d 648 [2008]).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the defendant's remaining contention that the sentence was excessive. Skelos, J.P., Dillon, Carni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.