Motovich v 1195 Coney Is. Ave. Corp.

Annotate this Case
Motovich v 1195 Coney Is. Ave. Corp. 2007 NY Slip Op 10121 [46 AD3d 777] December 18, 2007 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Boris Motovich, Plaintiff,
v
1195 Coney Island Avenue Corp. et al., Respondents, Roger Blank, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

—[*1] Hodgson Russ, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Daniel S. Steinberg of counsel), for appellant.

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, which was transferred to the Surrogate's Court, Kings County, the defendant Roger Blank appeals from (1) an order of the Surrogate's Court, Kings County (Lopez Torres, S.), dated June 12, 2006, and (2) a resettled order of the same court dated July 24, 2006, which granted the motion of defendants 1195 Coney Island Corp., Atlantic & Pacific Oil Co., Inc., and Samuel Ainbinder, individually and as coadministrator of the estate of Pearl Ainbinder, deceased, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The issues brought up for review on these appeals have been rendered academic by a settlement reached by the parties, and placed on the record in the Surrogate's Court, Kings County, on August 15, 2006. Pursuant to that settlement, to which the appellant consented, the subject realty was conveyed to the plaintiff. Accordingly, the appeals must be dismissed (see Asher v Gigante, 21 AD3d 916 [2005]). Miller, J.P., Crane, Dillon and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.