People v Ayler

Annotate this Case
People v Ayler 2007 NY Slip Op 09595 [46 AD3d 565] December 4, 2007 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 13, 2008

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Anthony Ayler, Appellant.

—[*1] Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (John Gemmill of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Steven A. Mann, and Linda Breen of counsel; John P. Buza on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), rendered June 8, 2005, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the People failed to present legally sufficient evidence to prove that he caused serious physical injury to any of the complainants is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19-21 [1995]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Garcia, 9 AD3d 470, 471 [2004]).

Defense counsel provided the defendant with meaningful representation (see generally People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Krausman, J.P., Fisher, Angiolillo and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.