Guttman v Gutman

Annotate this Case
Guttman v Gutman 2007 NY Slip Op 09557 [46 AD3d 514] December 4, 2007 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Henry Guttman, Respondent,
v
Aryeh Gutman et al., Appellants.

—[*1] Finkel, Goldstein, Rosenbloom & Nash, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Kevin J. Nash of counsel), for appellants.

Arnold J. Ludwig, Brooklyn, N.Y. for respondent.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty and imposition of a constructive trust, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bayne, J.), dated September 29, 2006, as denied their cross motion to compel the plaintiff to comply with the prior recommendation of a Judicial Hearing Officer (Barasch, J.), contained in a decision dated May 19, 2005, that the plaintiff should place $800,000 in escrow.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants' contention, the Judicial Hearing Officer was authorized to hear and report, not hear and determine, the factual issues (see First Data Merchant Servs. Corp. v One Solution Corp., 14 AD3d 534, 535 [2005]; CPLR 4311).

The appellants' remaining contentions are either without merit or are not properly before this Court. Krausman, J.P., Fisher, Angiolillo and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.