Cupo v Zola

Annotate this Case
Cupo v Zola 2007 NY Slip Op 09198 [45 AD3d 723] November 20, 2007 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Theresa Cupo, Respondent,
v
Benjamin Zola et al., Appellants.

—[*1] Lippman Krasnow & Kelton LLP, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Kelton, Denise Buda, and David T. Verschell of counsel), for appellants.

Goldfarb & Gerzog, New York, N.Y. (Ira Gerzog of counsel), for respondent.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for assault and battery, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bunyan, J.), dated March 28, 2007, as granted the plaintiff's cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3103 (a) for a protective order prohibiting them from videotaping the plaintiff's deposition.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the motion is denied.

Under the peculiar circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3103 (a) for a protective order prohibiting the defendants from videotaping her deposition. Crane, J.P., Ritter, Fisher, Covello and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.