People v DeGrijze

Annotate this Case
People v DeGrijze 2007 NY Slip Op 06897 [43 AD3d 1076] September 18, 2007 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, November 7, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Richard DeGrijze, Appellant.

—[*1] Richard DeGrijze, Beacon, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Anastasia Spanakos of counsel), for respondent.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 28, 1993 (People v Degrijze, 194 AD2d 801 [1993]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 15, 1991.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Crane and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.