Matter of Huang v Schulman

Annotate this Case
Matter of Huang v Schulman 2007 NY Slip Op 06878 [43 AD3d 1057] September 18, 2007 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, November 7, 2007

In the Matter of Steven Huang et al., Petitioners,
v
Martin J. Schulman, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Feng Li, Yonkers, N.Y., for petitioners.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Roberta L. Martin of counsel), for respondents Martin J. Schulman and Jeremy Weinstein.

Jack L. Glasser, P.C., Jamaica, N.Y. (Garris L. Williams of counsel), for respondents Fabian A. Sy, FAS Development Co., Inc., and 225 Associates.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel Martin J. Schulman, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, to calendar the above-entitled matter for immediate trial.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioners have failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Dillon and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.