Meyerhoeffer v Haviland Realty Corp.

Meyerhoeffer v Haviland Realty Corp. 2007 NY Slip Op 06649 [43 AD3d 888] September 11, 2007 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Dale Meyerhoeffer et al., Appellants,
v
Haviland Realty Corp. et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Robbins & Associates, P.C., New York, N.Y. (James A. Robbins of counsel), for appellants.

Burke, Scolamiero, Mortati & Hurd, LLP, Albany, N.Y. (Peter M. Scolamiero and Gerald D. D'Amelia, Jr., of counsel), for respondents.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered February 16, 2006, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In opposition to the defendants' prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendants owed them a fiduciary duty which they breached, engaged in fraud, or made a negligent representation (see J.A.O. Acquisition Corp. v Stavitsky, 8 NY3d 144 [2007]; Heaven v McGowan, 40 AD3d 583 [2007]). Thus, the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted. Miller, J.P., Crane, Ritter and Lifson, JJ., concur.