People v Urena

People v Urena 2007 NY Slip Op 03174 [39 AD3d 674] April 10, 2007 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 6, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Edward Urena, Appellant.

—[*1] Edward Urena, Stormville, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (John Gemmill of counsel), former appellate counsel.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 5, 2003 (People v Urena, 305 AD2d 433 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 10, 2001.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Miller, Mastro and Florio, JJ., concur.