Voss v Rockland County Community Coll.

Voss v Rockland County Community Coll. 2007 NY Slip Op 02744 [38 AD3d 880] March 27, 2007 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Thomas G. Voss et al., Appellants,
v
Rockland County Community College et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Daniel E. Bertolino, P.C., Upper Nyack, N.Y., for appellants.

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, LLP, New York, N.Y. (John D. Winter and Adam J. Pessin of counsel), for respondents.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated December 21, 2005, which denied their motion for summary judgment and granted the defendants' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Education Law § 6306 (2) states, in relevant part, that "[t]he board of trustees of each community college shall appoint a president for the college, subject to approval by the state university trustees" (see also 8 NYCRR 600.2). Here, the plaintiffs failed to establish, prima facie, that they were entitled to summary judgment (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). In contrast, the defendants made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract, as the State University of New York Board of Trustees did not approve the contract seeking to extend the appointment of the plaintiff Thomas G. Voss as the interim community college president. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Consequently, the Supreme Court properly summarily dismissed the plaintiffs' remaining causes of action to recover damages for tortious interference with contractual relations and to recover litigation costs and attorneys' fees, as those causes of action were predicated upon the invalid contract. [*2]

In light of our determination, the parties' remaining contentions have been rendered academic. Rivera, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.