People v Osborne

Annotate this Case
People v Osborne 2007 NY Slip Op 02145 [38 AD3d 686] March 13, 2007 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 9, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Bridget Osborne, Appellant.

—[*1] Bridget Osborne, Bedford Hills, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Jodi L. Mandel, and Terry-Ann Llewellyn of counsel), for respondent.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 9, 1998 (People v Osborne, 248 AD2d 491 [1998]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 11, 1997.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that she was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Crane and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.