Lee v J & R Elec., Inc.

Annotate this Case
Lee v J & R Elec., Inc. 2007 NY Slip Op 01835 [38 AD3d 501] March 6, 2007 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Cheryl Lee, Appellant,
v
J & R Electronic, Inc., et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Napoli Bern Ripka, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Denise A. Rubin of counsel), for appellant.

Callan, Koster, Brady & Brennan, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Michael P. Kandler of counsel), for respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated November 1, 2005, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly fell while descending an interior staircase in the defendants' premises. The defendants establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting the deposition testimony of the plaintiff wherein she stated that she did not know what had caused her to fall (see Fox v Watermill Enters., Inc., 19 AD3d 364 [2005]; Rodriguez v Cafaro, 17 AD3d 658 [2005]; Hartman v Mountain Val. Brew Pub, 301 AD2d 570 [2003]; Bitterman v Grotyohann, 295 AD2d 383 [2002]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Miller, J.P., Spolzino, Ritter and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.