Matter of Assalone v Pawling Cent. School Dist.

Annotate this Case
Matter of Assalone v Pawling Cent. School Dist. 2007 NY Slip Op 00134 [36 AD3d 613] January 9, 2007 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, March 14, 2007

In the Matter of Joanne Assalone, Appellant,
v
Pawling Central School District, Respondent.

—[*1] O'Neil & Burke, LLP, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (William T. Burke of counsel), for appellant.

Girvin & Ferlazzo, P.C., Albany, N.Y. (Christopher P. Langlois of counsel), for respondent.

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to direct Pawling Central School District to appoint the petitioner to the position of senior typist, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Sproat, J.), dated February 10, 2006, which denied her motion for leave to amend the petition to add a necessary party, denied the petition, and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner moved for leave to amend the petition to add a necessary party beyond the applicable statute of limitations. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied the motion, denied the petition, and dismissed the proceeding (see Matter of Boston Culinary Group, Inc. v New York State Olympic Regional Dev. Auth., 18 AD3d 1103 [2005]; Matter of Lodge v D'Aliso, 2 AD3d 525 [2003]).

The petitioner's remaining contentions either are improperly raised for the first time on appeal or need not be reached in light of our determination. Miller, J.P., Rivera, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.