237 W. 230 St. Realty Corp. v Castle Oil Corp.

Annotate this Case
237 W. 230 St. Realty Corp. v Castle Oil Corp. 2006 NY Slip Op 10053 [35 AD3d 847] December 26, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 14, 2007

237 W. 230 Street Realty Corp., Plaintiff,
v
Castle Oil Corporation et al., Respondents, Trans Service Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

—[*1]

In an action to recover property damages resulting from the discharge of petroleum, the defendant Trans Service Corporation appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Connell, J.), entered March 3, 2005, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Castle Oil Corporation and Old Republic Insurance Co. which was for summary judgment on their cross claim for indemnification against the defendant Trans Service Corporation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

As the Supreme Court correctly determined, the defendants Castle Oil Corporation (hereinafter Castle) and Old Republic Insurance Co. demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by establishing that the agreement between Castle and the defendant Trans Service Corporation (hereinafter Trans Service) unambiguously required the latter to indemnify Castle even if Castle was negligent and that, in any event, Castle was free of negligence in the incident giving rise to the plaintiff's claim in this action (see Margolin v New York Life Ins. Co., 32 NY2d 149, 153 [1973]; Levine v Shell Oil Co., 28 NY2d 205, 211-212 [1971]; New York Tel. Co. v Gulf Oil Corp., 203 AD2d 26, 28 [1994]). In opposition, Trans Service failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman [*2]v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Crane, J.P., Ritter, Lunn and Covello, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.