Cruz v Martins
Annotate this CaseEric Cruz, Respondent,
v
Luciano P. Martins, Appellant, and Jessica Grocery et al., Respondents.
—[*1]In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Luciano P. Martins appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated May 5, 2005, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff-respondent.
In support of his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him, the defendant Luciano P. Martins failed to demonstrate a prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alonso v Branchinelli, 277 AD2d 408 [2000]). Thus, the motion was properly denied regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.