People v Tatum

Annotate this Case
People v Tatum 2006 NY Slip Op 09285 [35 AD3d 511] December 5, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 14, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Christopher Tatum, Appellant.

—[*1]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered June 12, 2003, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

After conducting a Geraci/Sirois hearing (see People v Geraci, 85 NY2d 359 [1995]; Matter of Holtzman v Hellenbrand, 92 AD2d 405 [1983]), the trial court correctly determined that a previously cooperative eyewitness had been rendered unavailable due to threats made by the defendant's brother, at the defendant's initiative or acquiescence (see People v Cotto, 92 NY2d 68 [1998]; People v Geraci, supra).

Moreover, the court correctly declined the defendant's request to submit manslaughter in the first degree as a lesser-included offense of intentional murder (see People v Seabrooks, 27 AD3d 494 [2006]; People v Moreno, 16 AD3d 438 [2005]). Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.