Karen Panish v Sam Panish

Annotate this Case
Panish v Panish 2006 NY Slip Op 06070 [32 AD3d 382] August 1, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, October 11, 2006

Karen Panish, Respondent,
v
Sam Panish, Appellant.

—[*1]

In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust upon certain real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kent, J.), dated November 30, 2005, as granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to stay all further proceedings in the Justice Court of the Town of East Hampton between the parties and/or Lawrence Panish, and the enforcement and/or execution of any warrant and/or notice issued in such proceedings, pending determination of the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court did not err in staying a proceeding commenced by the defendant to evict the plaintiff from certain real property pending resolution of this action to impose a constructive trust upon the property (see Whitmarsh v Farnell, 298 NY 336, 344 [1949]; Reynolds v Division of Hous. & Community Renewal, 199 AD2d 15 [1993]; Matter of MacLeod v Shapiro, 20 AD2d 424 [1964]; 3 Dolan, Rasch's New York Landlord and Tenant-Summary Proceedings § 46:7 [4th ed]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.