People v Raymond Castro

Annotate this Case
People v Castro 2006 NY Slip Op 02907 [28 AD3d 674] April 18, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 21, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Raymond Castro, Appellant.

—[*1]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grosso, J.), imposed March 15, 2005, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment of four and one-half to nine years.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant was sentenced on March 15, 2005 for an offense that he committed on June 16, 2004. The Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738), while ameliorative in nature, expressly stated that the new sentencing structure it created for drug offenses "shall apply to crimes committed on or after the effective date" of the relevant sections of the statute, that effective date being January 13, 2005 (L 2004, ch 738, § 41 [d-1]). Accordingly, although the defendant was sentenced after the new sentencing provisions took effect, the Supreme Court properly sentenced him under the law in effect at the time of his offense (see People v Torres, 26 AD3d 398 [2006]; People v Goode, 25 AD3d 723 [2006]; People v Nelson, 21 AD3d 861 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 757 [2005]; see also People v Festo, 96 AD2d 765 [1983], affd 60 NY2d 809 [1983]; cf. People v Behlog, 74 NY2d 237 [1989]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Goldstein and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.