Ryan Oldham v Eastport Union Free School District

Oldham v Eastport Union Free School Dist. 2006 NY Slip Op 01472 [26 AD3d 480] February 28, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 19, 2006

Ryan Oldham et al., Respondents,
v
Eastport Union Free School District et al., Appellants.

—[*1]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated May 23, 2005, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

While a school is not the insurer of the safety of students (see Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49 [1994]), a school owes a duty to adequately supervise students in its care and will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision (see Mirand v City of New York, supra; Ghaffari v North Rockland Cent. School Dist., 23 AD3d 342 [2005]; Rivera v Board of Educ. of City of Yonkers, 19 AD3d 394, 395 [2005]; Doe v Rohan, 17 AD3d 509, 511 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 701 [2005]). In support of their motion for summary judgment, the defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issues of fact (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Failure to make such a showing requires denial of the motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (id.). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Florio, J.P., Skelos, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.