People v Jamall Samuel

Annotate this Case
People v Samuel 2005 NY Slip Op 09750 Decided on December 19, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 19, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
BARRY A. COZIER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
PETER B. SKELOS
JOSEPH COVELLO, JJ. DECISION & ORDER
2004-11306

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Jamall Samuel, appellant. (Ind. No. 737/03)




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel),
for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y.
(John M. Castellano and Merri Turk
Lasky of counsel; Lindsey Frischer
on the memorandum), for
respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), imposed November 17, 2004, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion.
PRUDENTI, P.J., COZIER, GOLDSTEIN, SKELOS and COVELLO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.